Downey v. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 2009
Docket09-6261
StatusUnpublished

This text of Downey v. Johnson (Downey v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Downey v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6261

BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON; HELEN F. FAHEY; JAMES SISK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00199-REP)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Ross Downey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Ross Downey appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his civil rights action under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Downey v. Johnson, No. 3:08-cv-00199-REP

(E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Downey v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downey-v-johnson-ca4-2009.