Downey v. Johnson
This text of Downey v. Johnson (Downey v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6261
BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GENE JOHNSON; HELEN F. FAHEY; JAMES SISK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00199-REP)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Ross Downey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Ross Downey appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his civil rights action under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Downey v. Johnson, No. 3:08-cv-00199-REP
(E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Downey v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downey-v-johnson-ca4-2009.