Downey v. Gallow

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Downey v. Gallow

156 So. 2d 67, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1890

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 1, 1963

DocketNo. 5917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 So. 2d 67 (Downey v. Gallow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Downey v. Gallow, 156 So. 2d 67, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1890 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

REID, Judge.

This case was consolidated with 5916 styled Moorehouse v. Gallow et al., La.App., 156 So.2d 62, and with No. 5918 styled O’Conner v. Gallow et al., La.App., 156 So.2d 67. The facts and the questions of liability were decided and fully discussed in the companion suit of Moorehouse v. Gallow et al., No. 5916.

In the case at bar plaintiff Richard E. Downey seeks judgment in the amount of $6,732.00 for loss of use of truck, automobile insurance deductible, hospital, future medical expenses and physical pain, suffer-mg, mental anguish, and permanent injuries. Plaintiff Foremost Insurance Company seeks judgment in the amount of $448.85 representing the amount of damages to plaintiff’s Chevrolet truck belonging to its insured less a deductible of $100.-00. The District Judge rendered judgment in favor of the defendants Clarence A. Gallow and New Hampshire Insurance Company, dismissing plaintiffs’ suit with costs and taxing the fee of a certain expert as costs.

For the reasons assigned in No. 5916, the judgment of the District Court in the present suit is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

REID, Judge.

This case was consolidated with 5916 styled Moorehouse v. Gallow et al., La.App., 156 So.2d 62, and with No. 5918 styled O’Conner v. Gallow et al., La.App., 156 So.2d 67. The facts and the questions of liability were decided and fully discussed in the companion suit of Moorehouse v. Gallow et al., No. 5916.

In the case at bar plaintiff Richard E. Downey seeks judgment in the amount of $6,732.00 for loss of use of truck, automobile insurance deductible, hospital, future medical expenses and physical pain, suffer-mg, mental anguish, and permanent injuries. Plaintiff Foremost Insurance Company seeks judgment in the amount of $448.85 representing the amount of damages to plaintiff’s Chevrolet truck belonging to its insured less a deductible of $100.-00. The District Judge rendered judgment in favor of the defendants Clarence A. Gallow and New Hampshire Insurance Company, dismissing plaintiffs’ suit with costs and taxing the fee of a certain expert as costs.

For the reasons assigned in No. 5916, the judgment of the District Court in the present suit is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 So. 2d 67, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downey-v-gallow-lactapp-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack