Downey v. Alex. J. White, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Downey v. Alex. J. White, Inc.

263 A.D. 827, 31 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5170

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 827 (Downey v. Alex. J. White, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Downey v. Alex. J. White, Inc., 263 A.D. 827, 31 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for the foreclosure of a mortgage on property occupied for business in the city of Yonkers. Order granting receiver’s motion to fix the occupational value of the property and requiring the mortgagor to attorn, and denying appellant’s cross-motion to vacate the order appointing the receiver, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The showing in respect of the insufficiency of the security for the mortgage debt justified the making of the order. The provision in the mortgage likewise justified the making of the order in view of the clause [828]*828containing an assignment of the rents. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for the foreclosure of a mortgage on property occupied for business in the city of Yonkers. Order granting receiver’s motion to fix the occupational value of the property and requiring the mortgagor to attorn, and denying appellant’s cross-motion to vacate the order appointing the receiver, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The showing in respect of the insufficiency of the security for the mortgage debt justified the making of the order. The provision in the mortgage likewise justified the making of the order in view of the clause [828]*828containing an assignment of the rents. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 827, 31 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downey-v-alex-j-white-inc-nyappdiv-1941.