Downes v. Downes

225 A.D. 886, 233 N.Y.S. 39
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 225 A.D. 886 (Downes v. Downes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Downes v. Downes, 225 A.D. 886, 233 N.Y.S. 39 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Order granting motion for temporary alimony and counsel fee reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. The plaintiff, in an action for a separation upon the grounds of abandonment, non-support and cruel and inhuman treatment, obtained an order for temporary alimony and counsel fee. Plaintiff’s aged parents reside with the parties. Defendant denies the wife’s charges. He refuses to live with the wife’s parents. Plaintiff refuses to have marital relations with defendant, and the record does not show any adequate excuse for such refusal. Under such circumstances defendant cannot be held to the marriage contract. “ * * * the wife who refuses to discharge her obligations to her husband cannot be heard to find fault because she is reaping the natural results of her conduct.” (Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74, 81.) Defendant chose a new domicile and offered a home and maintenance to his wife and two sons, but not to the wife’s relatives. The husband is not required to live with [887]*887Ms wife’s relatives. (Field v. Field, 79 Misc. 557.) It was the wife’s duty to go with her husband to the home which he had provided. (People v. Pettit, 74 N. Y. 320; People v. Flewellyn, 111 N. Y. Supp. 621.) Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Harris
46 Misc. 2d 355 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Fox v. Fox
17 Misc. 2d 998 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Barretta v. Barretta
182 Misc. 852 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D. 886, 233 N.Y.S. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downes-v-downes-nyappdiv-1929.