Downer v. Ford

16 Cal. 345
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 Cal. 345 (Downer v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Downer v. Ford, 16 Cal. 345 (Cal. 1860).

Opinion

Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

This is an action for the possession of a lot in the town of Oroville, and the questions in the case arise upon the evidence and the findings of the Court. It is contended that the evidence did not authorize the findings, and that the latter are insufficient to support the judgment. We do not see any such discrepancy between the evidence and the findings as would justify us in disturbing the judgment on that ground, and we think the findings sufficient to support the judgment. It appears that the lot in question was purchased by the plaintiffs of one Bird, and that the defendant has recognized the title of Bird under such circumstances that he cannot now dispute it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dudek v. Bigley
4 Pa. D. & C.3d 92 (Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, 1977)
Carson v. Broady
77 N.W. 80 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Cal. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downer-v-ford-cal-1860.