Downer v. Carter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Downer v. Carter

78 N.Y.S. 1114

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1902·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held, that the motion to compel the plaintiff to file security for costs must be regarded as having been made under section 3271 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and was, therefore, addressed to the discretion of the court, and, considering all thé circumstances, such discretion was not improperly exercised. Section 3268 does not apply, as the plaintiff is not a nonresident within the meaning of the Code. See Pursley v. Rodgers, 44 App. Div. 139, 61 N. Y. Supp. 1015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held, that the motion to compel the plaintiff to file security for costs must be regarded as having been made under section 3271 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and was, therefore, addressed to the discretion of the court, and, considering all thé circumstances, such discretion was not improperly exercised. Section 3268 does not apply, as the plaintiff is not a nonresident within the meaning of the Code. See Pursley v. Rodgers, 44 App. Div. 139, 61 N. Y. Supp. 1015.

Downer v. Carter, 78 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

78 N.Y.S. 1114 (Downer v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related