Downer v. Carter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Downer v. Carter

78 N.Y.S. 1114

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.Y.S. 1114 (Downer v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Downer v. Carter, 78 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held, that the motion to compel the plaintiff to file security for costs must be regarded as having been made under section 3271 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and was, therefore, addressed to the discretion of the court, and, considering all thé circumstances, such discretion was not improperly exercised. Section 3268 does not apply, as the plaintiff is not a nonresident within the meaning of the Code. See Pursley v. Rodgers, 44 App. Div. 139, 61 N. Y. Supp. 1015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held, that the motion to compel the plaintiff to file security for costs must be regarded as having been made under section 3271 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and was, therefore, addressed to the discretion of the court, and, considering all thé circumstances, such discretion was not improperly exercised. Section 3268 does not apply, as the plaintiff is not a nonresident within the meaning of the Code. See Pursley v. Rodgers, 44 App. Div. 139, 61 N. Y. Supp. 1015.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downer-v-carter-nyappdiv-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack