Dowling v. South Carolina

204 F. App'x 322
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2006·No. No. 06-7330·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charlton Javon Dowling seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Dowling v. South Carolina, No. 0-06-cv-01309-PMD (D.S.C. June 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dowling v. South Carolina, 204 F. App'x 322 (4th Cir. 2006).

204 F. App'x 322 (Dowling v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related