Dowling v. Kelly

263 A.D. 837, 31 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5199
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for an accounting of moneys alleged to have been intrusted by the plaintiff to the defendant for investment, the defendant pleads payment. Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate or modify the notice of examination before trial, and order denying defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars of the defense of payment, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The examination is to proceed on five days’ notice, and the bill of particulars is to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. In our opinion the record discloses special circumstances which justify a departure from the general rule not to direct a bill of particulars of the defense of payment. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dowling v. Kelly, 263 A.D. 837, 31 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

263 A.D. 837 (Dowling v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joffe v. Harbor Tank Storage Co.
17 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)