Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.

720 A.2d 513, 247 Conn. 907, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 352

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 15, 1998

DocketSC 15998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 720 A.2d 513 (Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc., 720 A.2d 513, 247 Conn. 907, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 352 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 330 (AC 16843/ 16844), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, with respect to the plaintiffs’ 1995 indemnification action, the prior general verdict barred the action because of the doctrine of collateral estoppel?”

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 330 (AC 16843/ 16844), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, with respect to the plaintiffs’ 1995 indemnification action, the prior general verdict barred the action because of the doctrine of collateral estoppel?”

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

720 A.2d 513, 247 Conn. 907, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowling-v-finley-associates-inc-conn-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack