Dowling v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance

87 So. 749, 81 Fla. 222
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 24, 1921·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In an action on a surety bond, given to an insurance company by its agent, having express reference to an employment contract, pleas were filed under which a defense may be proven by appropriate evidence as to the course of dealing between the agent and the company in violation of the contract of employment, which may have operated to release the sureties, upon the general principles stated in Fidelity Mutual Life Association v. Dewey, 83 Minn. 389, 86 N. W. Rep. 423, 54 L. R. A. 495, and other like cases; and as such pleas were not' wholly bad for the purpose stated, it was error to sustain the demurrers thereto. Tedder v. Green, [223] 79 Fla. 584, 84 South. Rep. 623. Writ of error was taken to a final judgmen rendered for the plaintiff.

Reversed for appropriate proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dowling v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance, 87 So. 749, 81 Fla. 222 (Fla. 1921).

87 So. 749 (Dowling v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Realty Bond & Share Co. v. Englar
143 So. 152 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Winchester v. Hak
124 So. 812 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)