Dowling v. Birnbaum
This text of 31 A.D.2d 927 (Dowling v. Birnbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, defendant Lippman appeals from an order of the Supreme 'Court, Eings .County, dated September 13, 1968, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, pursuant to CPLR 3216. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. We feel the extraordinary combination of misfortunes which affected plaintiff’s surviving attorney was responsible for the delay in prosecuting the action; and, absent any substantial prejudice to appellant, the interests of justice warranted the learned Special Term in denying the motion. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A.D.2d 927, 299 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowling-v-birnbaum-nyappdiv-1969.