Dowling v. Atlanta City School District

470 S.E.2d 514, 221 Ga. App. 116, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1848, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 1352
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dowling v. Atlanta City School District. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 Ga. App. 688
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 5, 1996·No. A94A2185·Published

Opinion

Pope, Presiding Judge.

In Dowling v. Atlanta City School Dist., 216 Ga. App. 688 (455 SE2d 399) (1995), we reversed the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s claims for damages and attorney fees under 42 USC §§ 1983 and 1988. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed our decision in Atlanta City School Dist. v. Dowling, 266 Ga. 217 (466 SE2d 588) (1996). Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

Judgment affirmed.

Beasley, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Birdsong, P. J., Andrews, Johnson, Blackburn, Smith and Ruffin, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dowling v. Atlanta City School District, 470 S.E.2d 514, 221 Ga. App. 116, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1848, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 1352 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).

470 S.E.2d 514 (Dowling v. Atlanta City School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dowling v. Atlanta City School District
455 S.E.2d 399 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Atlanta City School District v. Dowling
466 S.E.2d 588 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)