Dowling College v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dowling College v. State

97 A.D.2d 455, 467 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20046

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1983

DocketClaim No. 65211

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.2d 455 (Dowling College v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dowling College v. State, 97 A.D.2d 455, 467 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Amann, J.), dated January 24,1983, which granted the State’s motion for an extension of time within which to serve and file its appraisals and supporting documentation to the extent of directing that they be filed on or before April 30, 1983. Order affirmed, with costs. While the State’s failure to serve and file its appraisal and supporting documentation within approximately three years of its acquisition of title to the subject property was not commendable, it was not an abuse of discretion to have granted the State’s motion for a further extension in view of the complexity and comprehensiveness of the studies involved. We have considered claimant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Amann, J.), dated January 24,1983, which granted the State’s motion for an extension of time within which to serve and file its appraisals and supporting documentation to the extent of directing that they be filed on or before April 30, 1983. Order affirmed, with costs. While the State’s failure to serve and file its appraisal and supporting documentation within approximately three years of its acquisition of title to the subject property was not commendable, it was not an abuse of discretion to have granted the State’s motion for a further extension in view of the complexity and comprehensiveness of the studies involved. We have considered claimant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.2d 455, 467 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowling-college-v-state-nyappdiv-1983.