Dowleyne v. New York City Transit Authority

816 N.E.2d 191, 3 N.Y.3d 633, 782 N.Y.S.2d 401, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1600
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 29, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 816 N.E.2d 191 (Dowleyne v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dowleyne v. New York City Transit Authority, 816 N.E.2d 191, 3 N.Y.3d 633, 782 N.Y.S.2d 401, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1600 (N.Y. 2004).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and [634]*634the judgment of Supreme Court confirming the arbitration award reinstated, with costs.

The Appellate Division’s vacatur cannot stand because it improperly substituted its factual finding for that of a majority of the arbitration panel.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, and judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Middleton v. New York City Tr. Auth.
2024 NY Slip Op 33533(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Matter of Daesang Corp. v. NutraSweet Co.
2018 NY Slip Op 6331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.
846 N.E.2d 1201 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
816 N.E.2d 191, 3 N.Y.3d 633, 782 N.Y.S.2d 401, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowleyne-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ny-2004.