Dowleyne v. New York City Transit Authority

816 N.E.2d 191, 3 N.Y.3d 633, 782 N.Y.S.2d 401, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1600
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 2004·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and [634]*634the judgment of Supreme Court confirming the arbitration award reinstated, with costs.

The Appellate Division’s vacatur cannot stand because it improperly substituted its factual finding for that of a majority of the arbitration panel.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, and judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dowleyne v. New York City Transit Authority, 816 N.E.2d 191, 3 N.Y.3d 633, 782 N.Y.S.2d 401, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1600 (N.Y. 2004).

816 N.E.2d 191 (Dowleyne v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Middleton v. New York City Tr. Auth.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
Matter of Middleton v. New York City Tr. Auth.
2024 NY Slip Op 33533(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Matter of Daesang Corp. v. NutraSweet Co.
2018 NY Slip Op 6331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.
846 N.E.2d 1201 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)