Dowell v. . Vannoy
14 N.C. 23
Opinion
after stating the case as above, pro-
ceeded : I think it is only necessary to read the statement, to discover, that whatever error whs committed in the case, was the error of the plaintiff himself. He indulged Shackelford, and not the defendant. The "latter only acted in conformity to his instructions. There is certainly no ground upon which a new trial should be granted. -
Per Curiam — Judgment aeeirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dowell v. . Vannoy, 14 N.C. 23 (N.C. 1831).
14 N.C. 23 (Dowell v. . Vannoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rainey
120 Tenn. 357 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1907)