Dowell v. Raleigh Savings Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Dowell v. Raleigh Savings Bank & Trust Co.

102 S.E. 893, 179 N.C. 680, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 317

DecidedApril 7, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 893 (Dowell v. Raleigh Savings Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dowell v. Raleigh Savings Bank & Trust Co., 102 S.E. 893, 179 N.C. 680, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 317 (N.C. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined this case, and can see no error in it which is sufficient ground for a reversal of the judgment. The ruling of the judge upon the evidence appears to be correct, and when the other exceptions are- considered, we agree with the court that there was not any evidence which could be held as sufficient in law to support a verdict.for the plaintiff; and the judgment of nonsuit was properly allowed. This would still be our conclusion if the rejected evidence had been admitted.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined this case, and can see no error in it which is sufficient ground for a reversal of the judgment. The ruling of the judge upon the evidence appears to be correct, and when the other exceptions are- considered, we agree with the court that there was not any evidence which could be held as sufficient in law to support a verdict.for the plaintiff; and the judgment of nonsuit was properly allowed. This would still be our conclusion if the rejected evidence had been admitted.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 S.E. 893, 179 N.C. 680, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowell-v-raleigh-savings-bank-trust-co-nc-1920.