Dowell v. Mendenhall

45 Ind. 65
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 45 Ind. 65 (Dowell v. Mendenhall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dowell v. Mendenhall, 45 Ind. 65 (Ind. 1873).

Opinion

Downey, C. J.

This was an action by the appellants against the appellees, and in the common pleas there was judgment for the defendants, a motion for a new trial having beenmadeand overruled. There is but a single well assigned error, the sustaining of the demurrer of the defendants to the second paragraph of the complaint, and that is expressly waived by counsel for the appellants in their brief. Several grounds were stated in the motion why a new trial should be granted, but the overruling of the motion is not assigned as error. In this condition of the record, there is no question presented for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Petition for a rehearing overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Ind. 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowell-v-mendenhall-ind-1873.