Dowdy v. New York Health & Racquet Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dowdy v. New York Health & Racquet Club

223 A.D.2d 382, 636 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 223 A.D.2d 382 (Dowdy v. New York Health & Racquet Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dowdy v. New York Health & Racquet Club, 223 A.D.2d 382, 636 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered July 19, 1995, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied since issues of fact exist as to, inter alia, whether the alleged negligent supervision by a karate instructor, an employee of defendant, was a breach of defendant’s duty of care and to what extent, if any, plaintiff assumed the risk of injury by regularly partaking in the organized sparring sessions, which were conducted on a hard and allegedly slippery gym floor (Radwaner v USTA Natl. [383]*383Tennis Ctr., 189 AD2d 605, 605-606; see, Benitez v New York City Bd. of Educ., 73 NY2d 650, 658, quoting McGee v Board of Educ., 16 AD2d 99, 102, lv denied 13 NY2d 596). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Rubin, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered July 19, 1995, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied since issues of fact exist as to, inter alia, whether the alleged negligent supervision by a karate instructor, an employee of defendant, was a breach of defendant’s duty of care and to what extent, if any, plaintiff assumed the risk of injury by regularly partaking in the organized sparring sessions, which were conducted on a hard and allegedly slippery gym floor (Radwaner v USTA Natl. [383]*383Tennis Ctr., 189 AD2d 605, 605-606; see, Benitez v New York City Bd. of Educ., 73 NY2d 650, 658, quoting McGee v Board of Educ., 16 AD2d 99, 102, lv denied 13 NY2d 596). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Rubin, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 382, 636 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowdy-v-new-york-health-racquet-club-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack