Dowdy v. Louisa County

Fourth Circuit

Dowdy v. Louisa County

511 F. App'x 264

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2013·No. No. 12-7890·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark Ryland Dowdy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dowdy v. Louisa Cnty., No. 7:12-cv-00308-MFU-RSB (WD.Va. Oct. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [265] presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mark Ryland Dowdy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dowdy v. Louisa Cnty., No. 7:12-cv-00308-MFU-RSB (WD.Va. Oct. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [265] presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dowdy v. Louisa County, 511 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

511 F. App'x 264 (Dowdy v. Louisa County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related