Dowdle v. Stein
This text of 26 S.E. 53 (Dowdle v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A defendant against whom a judgment for an' -amount exceeding $50 was rendered in a county court had the right to enter an 'appeal therefrom to the superior court, and it was error to dismiss such appeal on the ground that as only a question of law was involved, the defendant’s remedy was exclusively by certiorari. See Brown v. Robinson, 91 Ga. 275, Which supports the ruling now made, and in which the decisions rendered by this court in Small v. Sparks, 69 Ga. 745, [662]*662and Rogers v. Bennett, 78 Ga. 707, are explained and their true meaning indicated. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 S.E. 53, 99 Ga. 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowdle-v-stein-ga-1896.