Dowdall v. Wisher
31 A. 749, 167 Pa. 475, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 932
This text of 31 A. 749 (Dowdall v. Wisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dowdall v. Wisher, 31 A. 749, 167 Pa. 475, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 932 (Pa. 1895).
Opinion
We find no substantial error in either of the rulings of the learned trial judge. He was clearly right in holding that the evidence was insufficient to sustain plaintiff’s contention, and in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant garnishee. There is nothing in either of the specifications that requires discussion. Neither of them is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 A. 749, 167 Pa. 475, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowdall-v-wisher-pa-1895.