Dowd v. Nairn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dowd v. Nairn

478 So. 2d 1205, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2730, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17223

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 11, 1985·No. No. 85-1847·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only point meriting discussion is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant Dowd’s motion to quash service of process. The record demonstrates that the appellee failed to comply with the notice of service of process requirements of section 48.161, Florida Statutes (1983). Sierra Holding, Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp., 471 So.2d 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and Robinson v. Cornelius, 377 So.2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Thus, we reverse and remand for the appellee to perfect service of process.

In all other respects, we affirm the trial court’s decision.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only point meriting discussion is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant Dowd’s motion to quash service of process. The record demonstrates that the appellee failed to comply with the notice of service of process requirements of section 48.161, Florida Statutes (1983). Sierra Holding, Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp., 471 So.2d 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and Robinson v. Cornelius, 377 So.2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Thus, we reverse and remand for the appellee to perfect service of process.

In all other respects, we affirm the trial court’s decision.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Dowd v. Nairn, 478 So. 2d 1205, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2730, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17223 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

478 So. 2d 1205 (Dowd v. Nairn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related