Dow v. Perlman
This text of 176 A.D. 902 (Dow v. Perlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, except that in the 3d paragraph of the complaint there will be stricken out only the following words, viz.: After the words “ were repeatedly rejected ” the words “Several claims of no particular value were allowed,” and after the words “defendant approached the plaintiff” the words “ stating to him that he and his attorneys were in despair as to the possibility of a successful prosecution of his case in the Patent Office.” Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent stated in opinion, with ten dollars costs. Order to be settled on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A.D. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dow-v-perlman-nyappdiv-1917.