Dow v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dow v. New York City Housing Authority

22 A.D.2d 696, 254 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3077

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 696 (Dow v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dow v. New York City Housing Authority, 22 A.D.2d 696, 254 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding iby an infant and his father pursuant to statute (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd. 5), for leave to serve a late notice of claim for damages for personal injury, -loss of services, etc., the New York City Housing Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered March 17, 1964, as granted such leave to the infant. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the infant (see Matter of Pandoliano v. New York City Tr. Auth., 17 A D 2d 951). If not already served, the time of the infant plaintiff to serve the notice of claim is extended until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Rabin, J., concurs in the result, adhering, however, to the dissent expressed by him in Matter of Pandoliano v. New York City Tr. Auth. (17 A D 2d 951).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding iby an infant and his father pursuant to statute (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd. 5), for leave to serve a late notice of claim for damages for personal injury, -loss of services, etc., the New York City Housing Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered March 17, 1964, as granted such leave to the infant. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the infant (see Matter of Pandoliano v. New York City Tr. Auth., 17 A D 2d 951). If not already served, the time of the infant plaintiff to serve the notice of claim is extended until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Rabin, J., concurs in the result, adhering, however, to the dissent expressed by him in Matter of Pandoliano v. New York City Tr. Auth. (17 A D 2d 951).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 696, 254 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dow-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1964.