Home/New York Court of Appeals/Dow v. Lomenzo

Dow v. Lomenzo

222 N.E.2d 614, 18 N.Y.2d 853, 275 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1042
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 27, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 222 N.E.2d 614 (Dow v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dow v. Lomenzo, 222 N.E.2d 614, 18 N.Y.2d 853, 275 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1042 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

[854]*854Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the order of Special Term reinstated. Upon the reargument it is not disputed that the problem presented by this appeal is the same problem considered in Matter of Crisafulli v. Lomenzo (18 N Y 2d 787 [decided Oct. 19, 1966]) which in turn rested on Matter of Carson v. Lomenzo (18 N Y 2d 263 [decided Sept. 29, 1966]). Since this proceeding is related to the same general election as Crisafulli and Carson, consistency and fairness require that petitioner be brought within the rule which applied to those cases.

Upon reargument: Order of this court dated July 7, 1966 (18 N Y 2d 612) vacated. Order of the Appellate Division (26 A D 2d 598) reversed and that of Special Term (52 Misc 2d 153) reinstated, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dow v. Lomenzo
52 Misc. 2d 153 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 N.E.2d 614, 18 N.Y.2d 853, 275 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dow-v-lomenzo-ny-1966.