Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Dow v. King

Dow v. King

52 Ark. 282
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Pleading. The interplea is bad whether the original action against the railway was for the conversion of the mule, or for damages for injury done it. In the former case it should have alleged a satisfaction of the judgment recovered for the conversion (Cooley on Torts, 338), and in the latter event the interpleaders had no claim to the property at all.

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dow v. King, 52 Ark. 282 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 282 (Dow v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huffman v. Landers Ford North, Inc.
265 S.W.3d 783 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2007)
Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Davis
56 S.W. 788 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1900)