Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Dow v. King

Dow v. King

52 Ark. 282
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 282 (Dow v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dow v. King, 52 Ark. 282 (Ark. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Pleading. The interplea is bad whether the original action against the railway was for the conversion of the mule, or for damages for injury done it. In the former case it should have alleged a satisfaction of the judgment recovered for the conversion (Cooley on Torts, 338), and in the latter event the interpleaders had no claim to the property at all.

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huffman v. Landers Ford North, Inc.
265 S.W.3d 783 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2007)
Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Davis
56 S.W. 788 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ark. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dow-v-king-ark-1889.