Dow v. Doyle
This text of 103 Mass. 489 (Dow v. Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The testator, in the fifth clause of his will, by directing his executors to procure a suitable residence for his daughter Julia at an expense not exceeding six thousand dollars, and to hold the same in trust for her and her son William “ during their lives; ” and, “ upon the decease of both,” devising said property over; clearly gave that daughter and her son an interest during their joint lives and the life of the survivor, which on her death before the testator’s did not lapse, but went to her son for life. Prescott v. Prescott, 7 Met. 141. Loring v. Coolidge, 99 Mass. 191. This devise to William was not varied by the-second codicil, which mentioned the death of his mother, increased a bequest made to his father by another article of the will, and one made to the Warren Academy by the first codicil, and expressly confirmed the will and the first codicil in all other respects. * ' Decree accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 Mass. 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dow-v-doyle-mass-1870.