Dow Coal Co. v. Anderson

1915 OK 551, 150 P. 881, 48 Okla. 704, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 689
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 6, 1915
Docket4600
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1915 OK 551 (Dow Coal Co. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dow Coal Co. v. Anderson, 1915 OK 551, 150 P. 881, 48 Okla. 704, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 689 (Okla. 1915).

Opinion

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This was an action for damages charged to have accrued on account of the breach of an oral contract for drilling “prospect holes.” There was a trial to the court and jury, and a verdict for the plaintiff, and judgment upon the verdict. To review which the defendant has lodged the cause here.

The record was filed in this court November 20, 1912, and the cause was regularly submitted June 7, 1915. The plaintiff in error has served and filed briefs, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). The defendant in error has failed to file briefs, and has offered no excuse for such default. An examination of the *705 record and the brief of plaintiff in error discloses the fact that the assignments of error are reasonably supported by the authorities.

We therefore recommend that the judgment appealed from be reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Com'rs Garvin Co. v. Pyeatt
1916 OK 729 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1915 OK 551, 150 P. 881, 48 Okla. 704, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dow-coal-co-v-anderson-okla-1915.