Dow-Arneson Co. v. City of St. Paul
225 N.W. 92, 177 Minn. 164, 1929 Minn. LEXIS 998
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from an order denying a temporary injunction. The questions involved were considered in the Ryan case, 177 Minn. 146, 225 N. W. 86, where there was a trial on the facts. The decision in that case is necessarily controlling of this, and the court was right in denying a temporary injunction.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dow-Arneson Co. v. City of St. Paul, 225 N.W. 92, 177 Minn. 164, 1929 Minn. LEXIS 998 (Mich. 1929).
225 N.W. 92 (Dow-Arneson Co. v. City of St. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ayres v. City Council of Los Angeles
207 P.2d 1 (California Supreme Court, 1949)