Dovid v. B'Nai Brith Youth Organization

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dovid v. B'Nai Brith Youth Organization

266 A.D.2d 75, 698 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11623

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 75 (Dovid v. B'Nai Brith Youth Organization) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dovid v. B'Nai Brith Youth Organization, 266 A.D.2d 75, 698 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about July 22, 1998, as corrected by order entered on or about August 13, 1998, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly held that plaintiff suffered no injury from the alleged deductions and late payments in tuition made by the Israeli government to various educational institutions in Israel, and that it therefore lacks standing to recover those payments. The motion court also correctly held that because plaintiffs right to designate students for scholarships has terminated, it can no longer make the 31 designations it neglected to make while that right was still alive. We have considered andrejected plaintiffs other arguments, including that the motion for summary judgment was untimely. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about July 22, 1998, as corrected by order entered on or about August 13, 1998, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly held that plaintiff suffered no injury from the alleged deductions and late payments in tuition made by the Israeli government to various educational institutions in Israel, and that it therefore lacks standing to recover those payments. The motion court also correctly held that because plaintiffs right to designate students for scholarships has terminated, it can no longer make the 31 designations it neglected to make while that right was still alive. We have considered andrejected plaintiffs other arguments, including that the motion for summary judgment was untimely. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 75, 698 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dovid-v-bnai-brith-youth-organization-nyappdiv-1999.