Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Dover v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

Dover v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

180 A.D.2d 661, 580 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1474
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1992·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals [662]*662from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated April 9, 1990, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, a triable issue of fact is presented as to whether the plaintiff suffered "serious injury” (see, Small v Zelin, 152 AD2d 690; Quaglio v Tomaselli, 99 AD2d 487; Harris v St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., 57 AD2d 127), and the Supreme Court therefore properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dover v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, 180 A.D.2d 661, 580 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

180 A.D.2d 661 (Dover v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co.
57 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Quaglio v. Tomaselli
99 A.D.2d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Small v. Zelin
152 A.D.2d 690 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)