Dover v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dover v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

180 A.D.2d 661, 580 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1474

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 180 A.D.2d 661 (Dover v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dover v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, 180 A.D.2d 661, 580 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals [662]*662from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated April 9, 1990, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, a triable issue of fact is presented as to whether the plaintiff suffered "serious injury” (see, Small v Zelin, 152 AD2d 690; Quaglio v Tomaselli, 99 AD2d 487; Harris v St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., 57 AD2d 127), and the Supreme Court therefore properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals [662]*662from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated April 9, 1990, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, a triable issue of fact is presented as to whether the plaintiff suffered "serious injury” (see, Small v Zelin, 152 AD2d 690; Quaglio v Tomaselli, 99 AD2d 487; Harris v St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., 57 AD2d 127), and the Supreme Court therefore properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 A.D.2d 661, 580 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dover-v-metropolitan-suburban-bus-authority-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack