Dover Boiler Works v. Paynter
191 A. 839, 118 N.J.L. 183, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dover Boiler Works v. Paynter. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 N.J. Misc. 759 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dover Boiler Works v. Paynter, 191 A. 839, 118 N.J.L. 183, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 288 (N.J. 1937).
191 A. 839 (Dover Boiler Works v. Paynter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.