Dove v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dove v. State

88 So. 3d 437, 2012 WL 1759391, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7980

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 18, 2012

DocketNo. 1D11-1842

StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 3d 437 (Dove v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dove v. State, 88 So. 3d 437, 2012 WL 1759391, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7980 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener’s error in the Order on Violation of Probation. The written order reflects that Gerald Dove violated conditions four and eleven of probation, but the record demonstrates that the trial court found that Dove only violated condition four. The written order on remand should be corrected as indicated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PADOVANO, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener’s error in the Order on Violation of Probation. The written order reflects that Gerald Dove violated conditions four and eleven of probation, but the record demonstrates that the trial court found that Dove only violated condition four. The written order on remand should be corrected as indicated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PADOVANO, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 So. 3d 437, 2012 WL 1759391, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dove-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.