Dove v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dove v. State

931 So. 2d 1032, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9787, 2006 WL 1650668

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 2006·No. No. 1D06-2224·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated May 9, 2006, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal filed on May 2, 2006, appealing the order on the appellant’s postconviction motion, rendered on July 15, 2005, is untimely. Because the notice of appeal was filed more [1033]*1033than 30 days after rendition of the order and the untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b).

DISMISSED.

BENTON, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated May 9, 2006, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal filed on May 2, 2006, appealing the order on the appellant’s postconviction motion, rendered on July 15, 2005, is untimely. Because the notice of appeal was filed more [1033]*1033than 30 days after rendition of the order and the untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b).

DISMISSED.

BENTON, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Dove v. State, 931 So. 2d 1032, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9787, 2006 WL 1650668 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

931 So. 2d 1032 (Dove v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.