Dove v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

98 A. 618, 253 Pa. 439, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 866
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 17, 1916
DocketAppeal, No. 360
StatusPublished

This text of 98 A. 618 (Dove v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dove v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 98 A. 618, 253 Pa. 439, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 866 (Pa. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

•The judgment in this case is affirmed upon the following from the opinion of the court below refusing to take off the nonsuit: “Keeping in mind the utter failure to prove a single item of negligence in the defendant, as well as the strong probability that the plaintiff himself was negligent, we could not sustain a verdict on the evidence.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A. 618, 253 Pa. 439, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dove-v-philadelphia-rapid-transit-co-pa-1916.