Dove v. Davis

25 F.2d 967, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3116
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 1928
DocketNo. 5251
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.2d 967 (Dove v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dove v. Davis, 25 F.2d 967, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3116 (5th Cir. 1928).

Opinion

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants executed a lease on their building for a term of five years, reserving a monthly rental of $1,000. The lease contained provisions to the effect that the rent should he paid monthly in advance, that in ease of default in the payment thereof “the entire rent for the rental period then next ensuing” should immediately become due, and that the lessor should have a lien therefor on all fixtures, goods, and chattels ou the leased premises. The lessee defaulted, after making payments amounting to $17,500 on account of rent, and was adjudged a bankrupt. This appeal is taken from an order rejecting proof by the lessors of claim of lien for a, balance of $42,500 as rent due for the whole unoxpired term of the lease, hut which recognized and allowed a claim and lien for the month’s rent next ensuing after the lessee’s default.

We are of opinion that the order appealed [968]*968from is correct. Rent was payable by tbe month, and' the only rental period mentioned in the lease was the monthly period. The lease, by providing for a lien “for the rental period then next ensuing,” protected the lessors for a full extra month beyond the then current month. The language used cannot fairly be construed as attempting to confer a lien for the unexpired term of the lease.

The order of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.2d 967, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dove-v-davis-ca5-1928.