Dove v. City of Kinston

51 F. App'x 459
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dove v. City of Kinston. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 F. App'x 101
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2002·No. 02-6846·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Dove appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint as to the Lenoir County Defendants. The remaining aspects of the case are still pending before the district court. This court’s jurisdiction to review cases is limited to those matters involving final decisions of the district court and certain specified interlocutory orders. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 (2000). Dove’s appeal does not involve a final order of the district court, nor does it involve an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal-as interlocutory.

Dove has also moved for sanctions against Appellees and questioned the timeliness of Appellees’ responsive brief. We have, reviewed each of these motions and find that they do not merit relief. Accordingly, we deny them both.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dove v. City of Kinston, 51 F. App'x 459 (4th Cir. 2002).

51 F. App'x 459 (Dove v. City of Kinston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related