Dov K. Avni A/K/A Dov Avni Kaminetzky v. David Alan Newman

Opinion

Opinion issued June 23, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

to challenge that order. We construe appellant’s motion, which contains a certificate

of conference stating that appellee’s counsel is not opposed to this motion, as an

unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2),

42.1(a)(1). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Massengale.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-16-00287-CV ——————————— DOV K. AVNI A/K/A DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY, Appellant V. DAVID ALAN NEWMAN, Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-22875 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Dov K. Avni a/k/a Dov Avni Kaminetzky, proceeding pro se, has filed an “Unopposed Motion to Withdraw His 1st Amended Notice of Appeal” of the sanctions order, signed by the trial court on March 16, 2016, because he states that he no longer wants to prosecute this appeal and instead will file a bill of review