Douthit v. Sheppard, Morgan & Schwaab, Inc.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JOHN K. DOUTHIT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vv. ) Case No. 4:23-cv-143-MTS ) SHEPPARD, MORGAN & ) SCHWAAB, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration. Doc. [21]. Plaintiffs request the Court to reconsider its April 28, 2023, Memorandum and Order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss part of Plaintiffs’ claims. Doc. [15]. “Motions for reconsideration serve a limited function: to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.” Arnold v. ADT Sec. Servs., Inc., 627 F.3d 716, 721 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir. 1988)). Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration presents no new evidence, argument, or other reason justifying relief from the Court’s prior order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration, Doc. [21], is DENIED. □ Dated this 23rd day of May, 2023. | | | Ko —

MATTHEW T. SCHELP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE