Dousman v. O'Malley

1 Doug. 450
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Doug. 450 (Dousman v. O'Malley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dousman v. O'Malley, 1 Doug. 450 (Mich. 1844).

Opinion

Ransom, C. J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The act of March 16, 1840, (S. L. 1840, p. 53,) under which the proceedings to dissolve the attachment were had, requires that the citation shall be served three days, at least, before the return day thereof. By the terms of this act, the return day is excluded in the computation of time. The Revised Statutes provide that, “in the construction of the statutes of this state,” “ any specified number of days shall be construed to mean entire days.” R. S. 3, ^ 3, subd. 11. This rule of construction would exclude the day of service, that being but the fraction of a day; and, but two entire days having intervened, between the day of service and the return day of the citation, the service was clearly insufficient. The Judge erred, therefore, in taking jurisdiction, and dissolving the attachment, and the judgment rendered by him must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snell v. Scott
2 Mich. N.P. 108 (Circuit Court of the 9th Circuit of Michigan, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Doug. 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dousman-v-omalley-mich-1844.