Doupe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Doupe v. State

75 S.W.2d 266, 127 Tex. Crim. 112, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 327

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doupe v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Tex. Crim. 390 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 17, 1934·No. No. 17114.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for robbery; punishment, ten years in the penitentiary.

There has been filed with the clerk of this court a proper affidavit certifying that pending appeal this appellant escaped from the custody of the sheriff on June 24, 1934, and has not been recaptured, or returned to custody. Under the terms of our statute this court is without jurisdiction to further consider said appeal. The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for robbery; punishment, ten years in the penitentiary.

There has been filed with the clerk of this court a proper affidavit certifying that pending appeal this appellant escaped from the custody of the sheriff on June 24, 1934, and has not been recaptured, or returned to custody. Under the terms of our statute this court is without jurisdiction to further consider said appeal. The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Doupe v. State, 75 S.W.2d 266, 127 Tex. Crim. 112, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 327 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

75 S.W.2d 266 (Doupe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.