Doukoure v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
This text of Doukoure v. JP Morgan Chase Bank (Doukoure v. JP Morgan Chase Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anthony Cannataro, J.), entered on June 29, 2017, which denied his motion to vacate his default and to restore the case to the trial calendar.
Per Curiam.
Order (Anthony Cannataro, J.) entered on June 29, 2017, affirmed, without costs.
This action was dismissed as a result of plaintiff's nonappearance at a scheduled court conference (see 22 NYCRR 208.14[b][2]), and plaintiff's two prior motions to vacate that dismissal were denied because of his nonappearance on the scheduled motion return dates. In this posture, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of plaintiff's most recent vacatur motion. Even assuming that plaintiff showed a reasonable excuse for his multiple defaults, he failed to demonstrate a meritorious cause of action (see Fink v Antell, 19 AD3d 215 [2005]; Munoz v KittyKind, Inc., 49 Misc 3d 128[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51396[U][App Term, 1st Dept 2015]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concurI concur
Decision Date: December 12, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Doukoure v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doukoure-v-jp-morgan-chase-bank-nyappterm-2018.