Douglass v. Sapotnick

173 So. 926, 131 Fla. 246

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Douglass v. Sapotnick. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 Fla. 753 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 18, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that case of Helen Douglass and V. E. Douglass v. Joe Sapotnick, Jr., a minor, by Joe Sapotnick, his next friend, and the judgment is reversed upon authority of the opinion and judgment in that case filed at the last term of the Court.

So ordered.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

So ordered.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, J., dissents.

Douglass v. Sapotnick, 173 So. 926, 131 Fla. 246 (Fla. 1937).

Pincite

173 So. 926 (Douglass v. Sapotnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.