Douglass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Douglass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation

679 So. 2d 409, 1996 La. LEXIS 2352, 1996 WL 537010

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 19, 1996

DocketNo. 96-CC-1653

StatusPublished

This text of 679 So. 2d 409 (Douglass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Douglass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 679 So. 2d 409, 1996 La. LEXIS 2352, 1996 WL 537010 (La. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Douglass, Steve; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-C-0359; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, No. 487-599.

Granted. Judgment of court of appeal vacated and set aside. Judgment of trial court compelling defendants to disclose the identity of the blood donors reinstated. See Most v. Tulane Medical Center, 576 So.2d 1387 (La.1991). The trial court is further ordered to enter an appropriate protective order to protect the confidentiality of the donors.

MARCUS, J., dissents for reasons expressed in my dissent in Most. [410]*410VICTORY, J., dissents for reasons assigned by MARCUS, J. BLEICH, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Douglass, Steve; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-C-0359; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, No. 487-599.

Granted. Judgment of court of appeal vacated and set aside. Judgment of trial court compelling defendants to disclose the identity of the blood donors reinstated. See Most v. Tulane Medical Center, 576 So.2d 1387 (La.1991). The trial court is further ordered to enter an appropriate protective order to protect the confidentiality of the donors.

MARCUS, J., dissents for reasons expressed in my dissent in Most. [410]*410VICTORY, J., dissents for reasons assigned by MARCUS, J. BLEICH, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

679 So. 2d 409, 1996 La. LEXIS 2352, 1996 WL 537010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglass-v-alton-ochsner-medical-foundation-la-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack