Douglass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation

679 So. 2d 409, 1996 La. LEXIS 2352, 1996 WL 537010
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Douglass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation. Read the opinion of the Court — 695 So. 2d 953
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 19, 1996·No. No. 96-CC-1653·Published

Opinion

In re Douglass, Steve; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-C-0359; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, No. 487-599.

Granted. Judgment of court of appeal vacated and set aside. Judgment of trial court compelling defendants to disclose the identity of the blood donors reinstated. See Most v. Tulane Medical Center, 576 So.2d 1387 (La.1991). The trial court is further ordered to enter an appropriate protective order to protect the confidentiality of the donors.

MARCUS, J., dissents for reasons expressed in my dissent in Most. [410]*410VICTORY, J., dissents for reasons assigned by MARCUS, J. BLEICH, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 679 So. 2d 409, 1996 La. LEXIS 2352, 1996 WL 537010 (La. 1996).

679 So. 2d 409 (Douglass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Most v. Tulane Medical Center
576 So. 2d 1387 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1991)