Douglass ex rel. Douglas v. United States Internal Revenue Service
This text of 35 F. App'x 661 (Douglass ex rel. Douglas v. United States Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Charles C. Douglass, Jr., M.D., appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate the underlying judgment dismissing his action for failure to serve defendants. We grant Crellin Derrick Douglass’ request for joinder. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Harman v. Harper, 7 F.3d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993). We do not consider the non-jurisdictional contentions regarding the underlying judgment. See Crateo, Inc. v. Intermark, Inc., 536 F.2d 862, 870 n. 15 (9th Cir.1976).
We have carefully reviewed the remaining contentions and motions, and conclude that they are unpersuasive. All remaining motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 F. App'x 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglass-ex-rel-douglas-v-united-states-internal-revenue-service-ca9-2002.