Douglas W. Haskins v. Russell Rogerson

19 F. App'x 473
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 2, 2001
Docket01-1481
StatusUnpublished

This text of 19 F. App'x 473 (Douglas W. Haskins v. Russell Rogerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas W. Haskins v. Russell Rogerson, 19 F. App'x 473 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Douglas W. Haskins shot his wife and was sentenced to three consecutive terms of imprisonment after an Iowa jury found him guilty of multiple offenses. He argued on direct appeal, as he does in this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceeding, that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to assert a double jeopardy challenge to the imposition of consecutive prison terms. See *474 State v. Haskins, 573 N.W.2d 39, 42-44 (Iowa Ct.App.1997) (en banc). Like the district court, we find the decision of the Iowa Court of Appeals was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court. See Siers v. Weber, 259 F.3d 969, 972 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of habeas relief. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F. App'x 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-w-haskins-v-russell-rogerson-ca8-2001.