Douglas v. Wilson
78 S.E. 50, 12 Ga. App. 666, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 695
Opinion
This ease is controlled by the decision of this court in High Co. v. Georgia Railway & Power Co., ante, 505 (77 S. E. 588). The court erred in refusing to dismiss the certiorari on the ground that the answer of the judge of the city court was not filed Within the time required by law, and that no order was applied for by the plaintiff in certiorari during the first term, requiring an answer to be filed. See, also, Sutton v. State, 120 Ga. 865 (48 S. E. 342).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Douglas v. Wilson, 78 S.E. 50, 12 Ga. App. 666, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 695 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).
78 S.E. 50 (Douglas v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Turner v. State
70 S.E.2d 45 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)