Douglas v. Trust Co.

95 S.E. 219, 147 Ga. 724, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 121
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 22, 1918
DocketNo. 459
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 219 (Douglas v. Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas v. Trust Co., 95 S.E. 219, 147 Ga. 724, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 121 (Ga. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is the general rule that no person can bring a writ of error -to reverse a judgment who was not a party or privy to the record, or prejudiced by the judgment. The plaintiff in error, as amicus curiae, has no right to except to the rulings of the court or to prosecute a writ of error, since he is not a party or privy, or in any way aggrieved by the judgment. Accordingly, the writ of error is dismissed on motion. Townsend v. Davis, 1 Ga. 495 (44 Am. D. 675) ; Lamar v. Lamar, 118 Ga. 684 (45 S. E. 498) ; 1 R. C. L. 1053-1054; 2 Corpus Juris, 1325.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Rouse
612 S.E.2d 308 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2005)
Brackin v. Trimmier Law Firm
897 So. 2d 207 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2004)
State Ex Rel. Baxley v. Johnson
300 So. 2d 106 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1974)
Village of North Atlanta v. Cook
133 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
Ackel v. Ackel
318 P.2d 676 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1957)
Vélez v. Doe
79 P.R. 605 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1956)
Dillin v. United Roofing & Supply Co.
129 S.E. 573 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 219, 147 Ga. 724, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-trust-co-ga-1918.