Douglas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Douglas v. State

383 S.W.2d 421, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1100

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 28, 1964

DocketNo. 37212

StatusPublished

This text of 383 S.W.2d 421 (Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Douglas v. State, 383 S.W.2d 421, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1100 (Tex. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment, three years and six months.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

By Bill of Exception #1 complaint is made of the refusal of the Court to grant a certain defensive charge. The bill contains no recitation of fact to demonstrate that such a charge should have been given. In the absence of a statement of facts bills of exception to the Court’s charge cannot be considered. Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 378 S.W.2d 325, and cases there cited.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI