Douglas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Douglas v. State

1930 OK CR 232, 288 P. 1114, 47 Okla. Crim. 316, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 400

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 17, 1930

DocketNo. A-7384.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 232 (Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Douglas v. State, 1930 OK CR 232, 288 P. 1114, 47 Okla. Crim. 316, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 400 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

*317 PER, CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Pottawatomie county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating, liquor, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of one month.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 21st day of May, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*317 PER, CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Pottawatomie county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating, liquor, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of one month.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 21st day of May, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 232, 288 P. 1114, 47 Okla. Crim. 316, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.